The design of a “strong government” in interwar Spain
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors retain all rights to the original work without any restrictions.
The issues are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) which allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under “the same, similar or a compatible license”.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63277/gsc.v51i.5338Keywords:
Glorious Revolution, Restoration, party rotation, parliamentarianism in practice, interwar constitutionalismAbstract
The formation of a strong executive in interwar Spain was greatly influenced by the flawed structure of the party system. After the Glorious Revolution (1868), there was a veritable explosion of political parties, most of them based purely on personality, which led to difficult governance and, consequently, weak executives. During the “Restauración” (1876-1931), an attempt was made to
alleviate this situation by imposing a two-party system (Liberal and Conservative), which would take turns in government by rigging the elections. It was then that a strong and stable government emerged, but one based on corruption in which, in reality, it was the government that determined the composition of Parliament, and not the other way around as would be typical of a parliamentary
system. During Primo de Rivera’s brief dictatorship, an attempt was made to overcome this model with a constitutional project that would establish a monarchical system inspired by presidentialism, in which the executive (the king, the Council of the Realm, and the Council of Ministers) would be the main political driving force. The establishment of the Second Spanish Republic represented the main attempt to create a strong and modern executive, based on the rationalized constitutionalism described by Mirkine Guetzevitch, whose influence in Spain was decisive. Even so, the deficient configuration of the head of state (a hybrid of presidentialism and parliamentarism) and parliamentary control meant that, in practice, it also failed to achieve the objective of establishing a truly strong executive branch.

