Nature in all its states. State of nature et civil war: Hobbes and the ancients, particularly Aristotle
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors retain all rights to the original work without any restrictions.
The issues are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) which allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under “the same, similar or a compatible license”.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63277/gsc.v26i.4875Keywords:
multitude, sovereign power, right of nature, political animal, utilityAbstract
The theme of the civil war represents a privileged way of comparing the political analyses of the ancients and of the moderns. In this perspective, the usual anthropological oppositions can be considered in a different way letting unexpected convergences be seen. The importance of Thucydides for Hobbes’ reflection on civil war must be therefore underlined. We will also try to show that what Hobbes owes to Thucydides concerns the whole of his anthropology. We must therefore discuss again, taking this point of view, the facts of the opposition between the work of him who is considered to be one of the founders of the modern political thought and the political thought of the ancients, at least when we are dealing with philosophers of the classical age, particularly Aristotle.

