Equity, inclusion and feminist pedagogies
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
All the papers are published under the CC BY-SA 4.0 licence.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13138/2039-2362/3143Abstract
This paper describes and expands on the contributions the research team at Technological University Dublin have made to the DICO Digital Career Stories Erasmus+ project from March 2021 through February 2023. This paper examines the TU Dublin presentation of specific Fine Art research methods and technical and practical tools, as a unique way to open these discussions around ethical teaching with regards to access, technology, gender, class, ethnic and racial diversity. This paper looks at some of the specific tools and methods common to fine art education and practice in the points of sharing sessions to ask how lecturing staff can deliver careers learning in the creative arts that is considerate and sensitive to the unique challenges that are presented in terms of equity and inclusion in third level creative arts education and careers stories creation.
References
Ahmed S. (2010), Happy Objects, in The affect theory reader, edited by M. Gregg, G.J. Seigworth, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 29-51.
Ahmed S. (2014), The Cultural Politics of Emotion, Edimburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Braidotti R., Bozalek V., Shefer T., Zembylas M. (2018), Socially Just Pedagogies: Posthumanist, Feminist and Materialist Perspectives in Higher Education, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Deffenbache K.A. (1980), Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: can we infer anything about their relationships?, «Law and human behavior», n. 4, pp. 243-260.
Le Guin U.K. (2019), The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction, Ignota.
Puig De La Bellacasa M. (2017), Matters of Care. Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Schöneich F., edited by (2022), Lawrence Abu Hamdan. Dirty Evidence, Milano: Lenz Press.