Managing controversial heritage through education. Experience at a site of perpetrators

Downloads

Pubblicato

2025-10-28

Fascicolo

Sezione

Sezione 3. Pratiche, processi, strategie per elaborare memorie controverse

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13138/2039-2362/3891

Autori

  • Giulia Avanza Università La Sapienza di Roma

Parole chiave:

Sites of perpetrators, heritage education, heritage management, controversial heritage

Abstract

This essay frames sites of perpetrators as a controversial heritage and explores the approaches taken to manage this class of heritage through education, proposing considerations from the analysis of the educational programme conceived and implemented at the Museum of Secret Surveillance “House of Leaves” in Tirana, which is housed in one of the former offices of the Albanian communist regime’s State Security. Beginning with a review of the scholarly literature on controversial heritage, sites of perpetration and education in memorial museums, the research proceeds with a methodology that combines the analysis of educational materials and interviews with museum staff and collaborators in educational activities.  The research identifies the potential and shortcomings of two key approaches to managing controversial heritage through education: embracing multivocality through witness testimonies and fostering critical thinking through personal engagement. The paper concludes pointing to the distinction between education at sites of perpetrators and education on perpetrators, and to underexplored educational opportunities.

 

Questo saggio inquadra i “sites of perpetrators” come patrimonio controverso ed esplora gli approcci adottati per gestire questa tipologia di patrimonio attraverso l'educazione, proponendo considerazioni a partire dall'analisi del programma educativo concepito e realizzato presso il Museo della Sorveglianza Segreta “Casa delle Foglie” di Tirana, ospitato in uno degli ex uffici della Sicurezza di Stato del regime comunista albanese. Partendo da una rassegna della letteratura scientifica sul patrimonio controverso e sull'educazione nei musei commemorativi, la ricerca procede con una metodologia che combina l'analisi dei materiali didattici e quattro interviste con il personale del museo e i collaboratori delle attività educative. La ricerca identifica il potenziale e le carenze di due approcci alla gestione del patrimonio controverso attraverso l’educazione: favorire la multivocalità attraverso l'uso di testimonianze e promuovere il pensiero critico attraverso il coinvolgimento personale. L'articolo si conclude evidenziando le opportunità non ancora esplorate di sfruttare il potenziale educativo dei “sites of perpetrators”.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Abrahams F.C. (2015), Modern Albania: From Dictatorship to Democracy in Europe, New York: NYU Press.

Adorno T.W. (1998), Education After Auschwitz, in Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 191-204.

Ambrosewicz-Jacobs J. (2018), Remembrance and education about the Holocaust and Gulag crimes at selected museums and memorial sites in the context of learning from the past and human rights education, «Studia Nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem», 40, 3, pp. 65-86.

Arnold-de Simine S. (2013), Mediating memory in the museum: trauma, empathy, nostalgia, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Arroyo Mora E., Cuenca López J.M. (2021), Patrimonios controversiales y educación ciudadana a través del museo en Educación Infantil, «Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado. Continuación de la antigua Revista de Escuelas Normales», 96, 35, 3, pp. 109-128.

Avanza G. (2025 - forthcoming), Dissonances in the Musealisation of Memory: Reflections from the Founding and Making of the Museum of Secret Surveillance “House of Leaves”, in Dissonances. Re-interpreting and reassessing difficult heritage, edited by F. Leonardi, G. Ludovici, Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Baiesi N., Gigli M., Monicelli E., Pellizzoli R. (2008), Places of Memory as a Tool for Education: The “Peace in Four Voices Summer Camps” at Monte Sole, «The Public Historian», 30, 1, pp. 27-37.

Bickford L., Sodaro A. (2010), Remembering Yesterday to Protect Tomorrow: The Internationalization of a New Commemorative Paradigm, in Memory and the Future: Transnational Politics, Ethics and Society, edited by Y. Gutman, A.D. Brown, A. Sodaro, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 66-86.

Cole E. (2017), No Legacy for Transitional Justice Efforts without Education, International Center for Transitional Justice: New York, available at <https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/Transitional_Justice_Legacy_Education.pdf>, 19.03.2025.

Dedaj N. (2017), Burgu i Spaçit, apo “Shtëpia e Gjetheve”?, in Panorama, 29.03.2017, available at <https://www.panorama.com.al/burgu-i-spacit-apo-shtepia-e-Gjetheve/>, 19.03.2025.

Demollari E. (2022), Muzeu kombëtar dhe Politika, PhD thesis, University of Tirana, available at <https://unitir.edu.al/muzeu-kombetar-dhe-politika/>, 19.03.2025.

Dervishi K. (2012), Sigurimi i Shtetit: 1944–1991. Historia e policisë politike të regjimit komunist, Tirana: Botimet “55”.

Dewdney A. (2013), Post-Critical Museology: Theory and Practice in the Art Museum, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Dittrich U. (2010), Pieces of the Past: Souvenirs from Nazi Sites — The Example of Peenemünde, in Memorialization in Germany since 1945, edited by B. Niven, C. Paver, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 114-123.

Erll A. (2014) Transcultural Memory, in Dictionnaire testimonial et mémoriel, Témoigner. Entre Histoire et Mémoire, 119, p. 172-178, <https://doi.org/10.4000/temoigner.1500>.

Estepa-Giménez J., Martín Cáceres M. (2020), Heritage in Conflict: A Way to Educate in a Critical and Participative Citizenship, in Handbook of research on citizenship and heritage education, edited by E.J. Delgado Algarra, J.M. Cuenca, Hershey: IGI Global, pp. 43-55.

Foucault M. (1997), The Politics of Truth, Semiotext(e) Foreign Agents Series, edited by S. Lotringer, New York: Semiotext(e), distributed by the MIT Press.

Hagen Kjørholt I., Panico M., Spiessens A. (2024), Special Section on Perpetrator Sites: Introduction, «Journal of Perpetrator Research», 7, 1, pp. 33-40.

Handa R. (2021), Presenting difficult pasts through architecture: converting National Socialist sites to documentation centers, London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Kjørholt I.H. (2024), The Nazi Camp Commandant’s House as a Space of Complicity: Understanding Art at Atrocity Sites – the Case of Falstad, Norway, «Journal of Perpetrator Research», 7,1, pp. 41-46.

Knittel S.C. (2020), The Ethics of Discomfort. Critical Perpetrator Studies and/as Education after Auschwitz, in The Routledge International Handbook of Perpetrator Studies, edited by S.C. Knittel, Z.J. Goldberg, London: Routledge, pp. 7-22.

Knittel S.C., Goldberg Z.J., edited by (2021), The Routledge International Handbook of Perpetrator Studies, Abingdon, Oxon – New York: Routledge.

Kończyk L. (2020), The pedagogy of memorial sites, «Journal of Education Culture and Society», 3, 1, pp. 15-22.

Kranz T. (2009), Edukacja historyczna w miejscach pamięci: zarys problematyki (Wydanie 2 zmienione), Lublin: Państwowe Muzeum na Majdanku.

LaCapra D. (2001), Writing history, writing trauma, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Latané B., Darley J.M. (1970), The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?, New York, NY: Appleton Century Crofts.

Laub D. (2000), Zeugnis ablegen oder die Schwierigkeiten des Zuhoerens, in Niemand zeugt fuer den Zeugen. Erinnerungskultur nach der Shoah, edited by U. Beer, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Light D., Creţan R., Dunca A.-M. (2019), Education and post-communist transitional justice: negotiating the communist past in a memorial museum, «Southeast European and Black Sea Studies», 19, 4, pp. 565-584.

Light D., Creţan R., Dunca A.-M. (2021), Museums and Transitional Justice: Assessing the Impact of a Memorial Museum on Young People in Post-Communist Romania, «Societies», 11, 2, pp. 43-64.

Liu Y., Dupre K., Jin X. (2021), A systematic review of literature on contested heritage, «Current Issues in Tourism», 24, 4, pp. 442-465.

Macdonald S. (2009), Difficult heritage: negotiating the Nazi past in Nuremberg and beyond, London: Routledge.

Majchrzak K. (2020), Places of remembrance in citizenship education, in «Journal of Education Culture and Society», 3, 1, pp. 7-14.

Melosik Z. (1998), Obywatelstwo, czas(historia) i przestrzeń (geografia), in Wychowanie obywatelskie. Studium teoretyczne, porównawcze i empiryczne, edited by Z. Melosik, K. Przyszczypkowski, Toruń-Poznań: Wydawnictwo Edytor.

Mëhilli E. (2017), From Stalin to Mao: Albania and the socialist world, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Mignolo W.D. (2018), The Darker Side of the Renaissance: Literacy, Territoriality, and Colonization, 2nd edition, reprint, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Ndlovu-Gatsheni S.J. (2018), Epistemic Freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and Decolonization, 1st ed., New York: Routledge, available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492204.

Núñez Seixas X.M. (2021), Sites of the dictators: memories of authoritarian Europe, 1945-2020, London: Routledge.

Olsen D.H., Timothy D.J. (2002), Contested Religious Heritage: Differing Views of Mormon Heritage, in «Tourism Recreation Research», 27, 2, pp. 7-15.

Panico M. (2024), Representing the Material Infra-Ordinary of the Perpetrator, «Journal of Perpetrator Research», 7, 1, pp. 71-104, available at: https://doi.org/10.21039/jpr.7.1.165.

Pearce C. (2010), The Role of German Perpetrator Sites in Teaching and Confronting the Nazi Past, in Memorialization in Germany since 1945, edited by B. Niven, C. Paver, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 168-177.

Rejmer M., Krasodomska-Jones Z., Lloyd-Jones A., Barber T. (2021), Mud Sweeter than Honey: Voices of Communist Albania, 1st Restless Books hardcover edition, Brooklyn, New York: Restless Books.

Rayback W.T., Beierl F.M. (2010), Opinion | A Damnation of Memory, in The New York Times, February 12, 2010, sec Opinion; available at: <https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/13/opinion/13iht-edryback.html>, 19.03.2025.

Rothberg M. (2019), The implicated subject: Beyond victims and perpetrators, Stanford University Press.

Smith L.T. (2022), Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, 3rd edition, London – New York – Oxford – New Delhi – Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.

Tunbridge J.E., Ashworth G.J. (1996), Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict, Chichester – New York: J. Wiley.

Üngor U.Ü., Kjell A. (2020), From Perpetrators to Perpetration: Definitions, Typologies, and Processes, in The Routledge International Handbook of Perpetrator Studies, edited by S.C. Knittel, Z.J. Goldberg, London: Routledge, pp. 7-22.

Urban M. (2010), Memorialization of Perpetrator Sites in Bavaria, in Memorialization in Germany since 1945, edited by B. Niven, C. Paver, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 103-113, available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248502_10.

Williams P.H. (2007), Memorial Museums: The Global Rush to Commemorate Atrocities, English ed., Oxford – New York: Berg.

Witcomb A. (2015), Toward a Pedagogy of Feeling: Understanding How Museums Create a Space for Cross‐Cultural Encounters, in The International Handbooks of Museum Studies, edited by S. Macdonald, H. Rees Leahy, 1st ed., Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 321-344, available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829059.wbihms116.

Zhiti V. (2023), Shtëpia me Gjethe, in Radiandradi, 12.09.2023, available at: <https://www.radiandradi.com/shtepia-me-gjethe-nga-visar-zhiti/>, 19.03.2025.

Come citare

Avanza, G. (2025). Managing controversial heritage through education. Experience at a site of perpetrators. Il Capitale Culturale. Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage, (19), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.13138/2039-2362/3891

Articoli simili

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

Puoi anche Iniziare una ricerca avanzata di similarità per questo articolo.