L’università come catalizzatore di relazioni per la valorizzazione del capitale territoriale / The university as a catalyst of relationships for enhancing territorial capital
Downloads
Additional Files
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
La licenza adottata è la Creative Commons - Attribuzione/Condividi allo stesso modo. Ovvero, gli autori che pubblicano su questa rivista accettano le seguenti condizioni:
- Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons - Attribuzione che permette ad altri di condividere l'opera indicando la paternità intellettuale e la prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell'opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono diffondere la loro opera online (es. in repository istituzionali o nel loro sito web) prima e durante il processo di submission, poiché può portare a scambi produttivi e aumentare le citazioni dell'opera pubblicata.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13138/2039-2362/2535Abstract
Le conseguenze del Covid-19 sull’economia e sulla società hanno richiesto un impegno straordinario alle università che, come noto, hanno oramai missioni multidimensionali: alla prima (didattica) e alla seconda (ricerca) si è affiancata gradualmente una terza missione che le ha conferito un ruolo propulsivo per lo sviluppo e l’innovazione e ha imposto comportamenti di civic engagement. Nonostante la crescente attenzione del mondo accademico, istituzionale e civile verso il rinnovato impegno delle università, e nonostante i numerosi quadri teorici sviluppati, la letteratura appare a tutt’oggi ancora frammentata e la gran parte delle università sono ancora lontane dai modelli teorici emergenti. La vera sfida posta dal Covid-19 all’università è stata dar prova concreta del civic engagement per contrastare almeno in parte le conseguenze della pandemia. In Italia, così come in buona parte del resto del mondo, l’università sembra aver saputo recitare questo nuovo ruolo. La domanda che ci si pone è se l’esperienza di questi mesi possa costituire un utile insegnamento per innescare una forte spinta propulsiva alle università e restituire centralità al sapere.
The consequences of Covid-19 on the economy and society have required an extraordinary commitment from the universities which, as is well known, now have multidimensional missions: the first (teaching) and the second (research) have gradually been joined by a third mission that has conferred a propulsive role for development and innovation and imposed “civic engagement” behaviors. Despite the growing attention of the academic, institutional and civil world towards the renewed commitment of universities, and despite the numerous theoretical frameworks developed, the literature appears to be still fragmented and most universities are still far from the emerging theoretical models. The real challenge posed by Covid-19 to the university was to give concrete proof of “civic engagement” to at least partially counter the consequences of the pandemic. In Italy, as well as in much of the rest of the world, the university seems to have been able to play this new role. The question that arises is whether the experience of recent months can be useful teaching to trigger a strong driving force in universities and restore the centrality of knowledge.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Allison J., Keane J. (2001), Evaluating the role of the Sunshine Coast University (USC) in the regional economy, «Local Economy», 16, n. 2, pp. 123-141.
Benneworth P., Pinheiro R., Karlsen J. (2017), Strategic agency and institutional change: Investigating the role of universities in regional innovation systems (RISs), «Regional Studies», 51, n. 2, pp. 235-248.
Bringle R.G., Hatcher J. A., Holland B. (2007), Conceptualizing civic engagement: Orchestrating change at a metropolitan university, «Metropolitan Universities», 18, n. 3, pp. 57-74.
Bryer T.A., Pliscoff C., Connors A.W. (2020), Civic mission of the university, in Promoting Civic Health Through University-Community Partnerships, edited by T.A. Bryer, C. Pliscoff, A.W. Connors, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 7-32.
Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F. (2009), ‘Mode 3’ and ’Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, «International Journal of Technology Management», 46, n. 3-4, pp. 201-234.
Carayannis E.G, Campbell D.F. (2010), Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate to Each Other? A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology, «International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development», 1, n. 1, pp. 41-69.
Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F. (2012), Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems, in Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems, edited by E.G. Carayannis, D.F. Campbell, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 1-63.
Carayannis E.G., Rakhmatullin R. (2014), The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond, «Journal of the Knowledge Economy», 5, n. 2, pp. 212-239.
Chatterton P., Goddard J. (2000), The response of higher education institutions to regional needs, «European Journal of Education», 35, n. 4, pp. 475-496.
Chile L.M., Black X.M. (2015), University–community engagement: Case study of university social responsibility, «Education, Citizenship and Social Justice», 10, n. 3, pp. 234-253.
Clark B.R. (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Organisational Pathways of Transformation, New York: Pergamon Press.
Enders J., Boer H. (2009), The mission impossible of the European university: Institutional confusion and institutional diversity, in European integration and the governance of higher education and research, edited by A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, P. Maassen, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 159-178.
Etzkowitz H. (1983), Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science, «Minerva», n. 21, pp. 198-233.
Etzkowitz H. (2003), Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university, «Research Policy», 32, n. 1, pp. 109-121.
Etzkowitz H. (2003a), Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university, «Research Policy», 32, n. 1, pp. 109-121.
Etzkowitz H. (2003b), Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations, «Social science information», 42, n. 3, pp. 293-337.
Etzkowitz H. (2013), Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university, «Social Science Information», 52, n. 3, pp. 486-511.
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000), The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations, «Research Policy», 29, n. 2, pp. 109-123.
Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C., Terra B.R.C. (2000), The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, «Research Policy», 29, n. 2, pp. 313-330.
Gibb A.A. (2005), Towards the entrepreneurial university. Entrepreneurship education as a lever for change, NCGE Policy paper series, n. 15.
Goddard J. (1999), Universities and regional development: an overview, in Universities and the Creation of Wealth, edited by G. Gray, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, pp. 36-47.
Goddard J. (2009), Re-inventing the civic university, London: Nesta.
Goddard J., Kempton L. (2016), The Civic University. Universities in leadership and management of place, Newcastle University: Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies.
Goddard J., Vallance P. (2013), The university and the city, London: Routledge.
Grimaldi R., Kenney M., Siegel D.S., Wright M. (2011), 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship, «Research Policy», 40, n. 8, pp. 1045-1057.
Guerrero M., Cunningham J.A., Urbano D. (2015), Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom, «Research Policy», 44, n. 3, pp. 748-764.
Guerrero M., Urbano D. (2012), The development of an entrepreneurial university, «The Journal of Technology Transfer», 37, n. 1, pp. 43-74.
Guerrero M., Urbano D., Cunningham J., Organ D. (2014), Entrepreneurial universities in two European regions: A case study comparison, «The Journal of Technology Transfer», 39, n. 3, pp. 415-434.
Guerrero M., Urbano D., Fayolle A. (2016), Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: evidence from European entrepreneurial universities, «The Journal of Technology Transfer», 41, n. 1, pp. 105-131.
Harrison J., Turok I. (2017), Universities, knowledge and regional development, «Regional Studies», 51, n. 7, pp. 977-981.
Hart A., Northmore S. (2011), Auditing and evaluating university–community engagement: Lessons from a UK case study, «Higher Education Quarterly», 65, n. 1, pp. 34-58.
Kempton L., Goddard J., Edwards J., Hegyi F.B., Elena-Pérez S. (2013), Universities and smart specialization, S3 policy brief series, n. 3, European Commission Joint Research Centre: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, Spain.
Kim Y., Kim W., Yang T. (2011), The effect of the triple helix system and habitat on regional entrepreneurship: empirical evidence from the U.S., «Research Policy», 41, n. 1, pp. 154-166.
Klofsten M., Jones-Evans D. (2000), Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe-The Case of Sweden and Ireland, «Small Business Economics», 14, n. 4, pp. 299-310.
Knudsen M.P., Frederiksen M.H., Goduscheit R.C. (2019), New forms of engagement in third mission activities: a multi-level university-centric approach, «Innovation», https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1670666.
Larrán Jorge M., Andrades Peña F.J. (2017), Analysing the literature on university social responsibility: A review of selected higher education journals, «Higher Education Quarterly», 71, n. 4, pp. 302-319.
Leydesdorff L. (2012), The triple helix, quadruple helix,…, and an N-tuple of helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy?, «Journal of the Knowledge Economy», 3, n. 1, pp. 25-35.
Leydesdorff L., Etzkowitz H. (1996), Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations, «Science and Public Policy», 23, n. 5, pp. 279-286.
Leydesdorff L., Meyer M. (2006), Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue, «Research Policy», 35, n. 10, pp. 1441-1449.
McAdam M., Debackere K. (2018), Beyond ‘triple helix’ toward ‘quadruple helix’ models in regional innovation systems: Implications for theory and practice, «R&D Management», 48, n. 1, pp. 3-6.
Milani L. (2017), L’Università: un bene comune per il Bene Comune, «Metis», 7, n. 2, pp. 1-14.
Miller K., McAdam R., McAdam M. (2018), A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda, «R&D Management», 48, n. 1, pp. 7-24.
Molas-Gallart J., Salter A., Patel P., Scott A., Duran X. (2002), Measuring Third Stream Activities: Final Report of the Russell Group of Universities, University of Sussex: SPRU Science and Technology Policy Research Unity.
Ostrander S.A. (2004), Democracy, civic participation, and the university: A comparative study of civic engagement on five campuses, «Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly», 33, n. 1, pp. 74-93.
Perkmann M., Tartari V., McKelvey M., Autio E., Broström A., D’Este, P., ... Krabel S. (2013), Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations, «Research Policy», 42, n. 2, pp. 423-442.
Philpott K., Dooley L., O’Reilly C., Lupton G. (2011), The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions, «Technovation», 31, n. 4, pp. 161-170.
Plewa C., Korff N., Johnson C., Macpherson G., Baaken T., Rampersad G.C. (2013), The evolution of university–industry linkages. A framework, «Journal of Engineering and Technology Management», 30, n. 1, pp. 21-44.
Porter M.E., Kramer M. (2011), Creating Shared Value, «Harvard Business Review», 89, n. 1, pp. 62-77.
Pugh R. (2017), Universities and economic development in lagging regions: ‘triple helix’ policy in Wales, «Regional Studies», 51, n. 7, pp. 982-993.
Riviezzo A., Liñán F., Napolitano M.R. (2017), Assessing the Entrepreneurial Orientation of University Departments. A Comparative Study Between Italy and Spain, in Entrepreneurial Universities. Exploring the Academic and Innovation Dimensions of Entrepreneurship in Higher Education, edited by M. Peris-Ortiz, J.A. Gomez, J.M. Merigo, C. Rueda Armengot, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 35-46.
Riviezzo A., Napolitano M.R. (2010), Italian Universities and the Third Mission: A Longitudinal Analysis of Organizational and Educational Evolution towards the ‘Entrepreneurial University’, «Industry and Higher Education», 24, n. 3, pp. 227-236.
Riviezzo A., Napolitano M.R., Fusco F. (2019a), From the Entrepreneurial University to the Civic University: What Are We Talking About?, in Smart Specialization Strategies and the Role of Entrepreneurial Universities , edited by N. Caseiro, D. Santos, Hershey: IGI Global, pp. 60-80.
Riviezzo A., Napolitano M.R., Fusco, F. (2020), Along the Pathway of University Missions: A Systematic Literature Review of Performance Indicators, in Examining the Role of Entrepreneurial Universities in Regional Development, edited by A.D. Daniel, A.C.C. Teixeira, M.T. Preto, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 24-50.
Riviezzo A., Santos S.C., Liñán F., Napolitano M.R., Fusco F. (2019b), European universities seeking entrepreneurial paths: the moderating effect of contextual variables on the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship, «Technological Forecasting and Social Change», n. 141, April, pp. 232-248.
Rubens A., Spigarelli F., Cavicchi A., Rinaldi C. (2017), Universities’ third mission and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher education institutions, «Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy», 11, n. 3, pp. 354-372.
Schmitz A., Urbano D., Dandolini G.A., de Souza J.A., Guerrero M. (2017), Innovation and entrepreneurship in the academic setting: a systematic literature review, «International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal», 13, n. 2, pp. 369-395.
Shaw J.K., Allison J. (1999), The intersection of the learning region and local and regional economic development: Analysing the role of higher education, «Regional Studies», 33, n. 9, pp. 896-902.
Thornton C.H., Jaeger A.J. (2008), The role of culture in institutional and individual approaches to civic responsibility at research universities, «The Journal of Higher Education», 79, n. 2, pp. 160-182.
Trencher G., Yarime M., McCormick K.B., Doll C.N., Kraines S.B. (2014), Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability, «Science and Public Policy», 41, n. 2, pp. 151-179.
Trigilia C. (2005), Sviluppo locale. Un progetto per l’Italia, Roma: Laterza.
Urbano D., Guerrero M. (2013), Entrepreneurial universities: Socioeconomic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European region, «Economic Development Quarterly», 27, n. 1, pp. 40-55.
Varaldo R. (2014), La nuova partita dell’innovazione, Bologna: Il Mulino.
